A new type of long-range Ukrainian FPV drone is destroying Russian mobile air defense systems. The greater reach of this type of weapon brings many new targets into range, and the Ukrainians are taking advantage by knocking out expensive equipment before the Russians can move it to safety.
The new weapons have been dubbed ‘Ukrolancets’ as they fulfill a similar role to Russia’s much-feared Lancet kamikaze drones. But they are likely to appear in much larger numbers.
This drone, which social media has called RAM X although its specific name remains classified, is said to be capable of accurately striking targets located more than 100 kilometers away.
The new drone was first mentioned in a Telegram post on the official channel of the Khortytsia operational-strategic group fighting in Ukraine’s Eastern front on Tuesday April 9th in a video with the following description:
“As a result of aerial reconnaissance in the area of the settlement of Zorya, the enemy’s 2S6 Tunguska air defense system was detected. A RAM X loitering munition was launched at the detected target. As a result of fire damage, the detected target was critically damaged.”
Several more strikes from the same type of munitions appear in a new compilation video from the Ukrainian SBU showing the destruction of various air defence systems: Two Buk launcher vehicles, a Buk radar vehicle, two Tor systems, a Strela-10, and a (different) Tunguska, pretty much a collect-the-set of Russian mobile surface-to-air systems, possibly to emphasize the point that nothing stops them. These are expensive assets which will be difficult or impossible to replace in wartime.
Another video from April 10th shows a successful strike on a Russian mobile Borisoglebsk-2 electronic warfare system which clearly failed to either jam the attack drone or the scout drone filming the strike.
There are some interesting points here. One is that the Tunguska, a tracked air defence system with twin 30mm cannon, four surface-to-air missiles and its own integrated radar which is supposed to shoot down drones, was tracked and destroyed by Ukrainian drones. This is not so unusual: a detailed Russian report from 2020 noted that their tactical air defence was almost useless against small targets.
Another point is the name of the drone. RAM X implies an upgraded version of the RAM II loitering munition made by Ukrainian company CDET. The company produces the highly successful Leleka-100 (“Stork-100”) fixed-wing reconnaissance drone, which has a seven-foot wingspan and an endurance of more than two hours, making it a prized asset for long-range, long-duration reconnaissance.
The RAM II was unveiled way back in 2018 when it was offered for export but attracted little interest. It has a range of 30 km/ 20 miles, carries a 3 kilo/ 6.5 lb. warhead and can strike with pinpoint precision. It has not been seen in this conflict and it appears the design has been modified in the new version.
Ukrainian military news site Mil-In-UA notes that videos of the long-range strikes have the same red/green targeting boxes seen previously in demonstrations of the RAM II, which strengthen the connection.
A third point of note is that the drone itself is practically invisible in the video. Unlike the Lancet, which is easily identifiable in attack videos from its distinctive white silhouette with double-X wings , the RAM X is much harder to spot. From what is visible, it looks like a conventional aircraft layout with a single pair of wings like the Lelka-100.
Russia’s Lancet loitering munition, made by Kalashnikov subsidiary ZALA, has been one of the great success stories of the conflict. The 12 kilo/ 26-pound weapon has a range of more than 40 km/ 25 miles and has proved highly effective at knocking out tanks, artillery and other targets. The main limitation has been that it has only been produced in small numbers, apparently due to a Ukrainian drone strike against the plant which produces vital components. In addition, there are questions over the effectiveness of its targeting software with many misses recorded.
This success has led many to ask where Ukraine’s equivalent was. Ukraine has fielded small numbers of imported U.S. Switchblades (and elusive Phoenix Ghosts) and Polish Warmate loitering munitions and a few indigenous designs, but these have had little impact. Ukraine’s FPVs are undoubtedly effective, but something with longer reach is needed.
In February 2024, Mykhailo Fedorov, Minister of Digital Transformation and drone supremo stated that two Ukrainian Lancet equivalents were in production and would be fielded soon. These include terminal guidance so can hit targets even if they are protected by jammers.
The RAM X is likely to be one of those products. Others under development include the Perun, which looks to be a direct, reverse-engineered copy of the Lancet (which itself owes a lot of design features to Israel’s Hero loitering munitions) and the Bayonet made by Terminal Autonomy.
What all these weapons offer is a similar capability to the ubiquitous FPV kamikaze drone with greatly extended range. And while the Lancet costs a reported $30,000, the Ukrolancets will be produced at a fraction of the cost and in far greater numbers. Even other Russian drone developers think Lancet is vastly overpriced, but the makers enjoy a comfortable relationship with Russia’s Ministry of Defence.
While FPVs typically hit at ranges of 10 km/ 6 miles or so and occasionally double that, Ukrolancets can reach 50 km / 30 miles or more depending on communications. This is HIMARS-type range and means they can hit Russian targets like artillery and air defense systems which are normally kept well back out of FPV range. The motive for hitting air defense first is likely to be based on value, with one Tor system priced at around $24m. Whether Russia can replace such systems is an open question.
Long-range strikes require good intelligence. Ukraine appears to have plenty of target information from data passed by the U.S. and others allies who have a wealth of satellite and other intelligence-gathering systems, but the need for this data will be a major limiting factor for other forces using such weapons in future conflicts.
Previously as Ukraine has gained longer-range strike capability, the Russians have been forced to pull back their forces. HIMARS destroyed many Russian ammunition depots and headquarters before these were relocated out of range. FPVs mean that in some areas Russian tanks have reportedly been pulled back several miles from the front line to avoid destruction.
Can artillery and air defence still do their job if they have to be kept back far from the front line most of the time and only pushed forward when needed? Given how visible moving vehicles are, are they going to get hit every time they go into action? As Ukraine rolls out its Ukrolancets, we will get the answers as a giant new game of Russian Roulette unfolds.
© 2024, GDC. © GDC and www.globaldefensecorp.com. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to www.globaldefensecorp.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Be the first to comment