Radioactive corruption: Russia’s Rosatom was involved in a corrupt deal with South Africa, Putin and Zuma wanted to pocket billions from the nuclear deal- Reuters

South Africa’s Koeberg nuclear power station is seen on the outskirts of Cape Town, South Africa, Wednesday, Feb. 8, 2012.

The South African government planned to build new nuclear power stations to generate more electricity amid an energy crisis and regular blackouts in the continent’s most advanced economy.

According to officials, the move to invite bids to build the stations — which will take at least a decade to be ready — was immediately criticized by the main political opposition party, which said that Russian state-owned nuclear agency Rosatom was the South African government’s “preferred partner.”

Government officials didn’t name any potential bidders and only outlined the start of the process.

But the criticism by the opposition Democratic Alliance was linked to a major nuclear deal South Africa signed with Russia in 2014 worth an estimated $76 billion that was shrouded in secrecy and canceled by a South African court in 2017 for being illegal and unconstitutional. It was tarnished with allegations of large-scale corruption and was signed under the leadership of former South African President Jacob Zuma, who is now on trial on unrelated corruption charges.

Plans for the new nuclear stations came a day after the South African government approved an agreement with Russian bank Gazprombank to restart a gas-to-liquids oil refinery on the country’s south coast. The refinery has been out of operation since 2020. Gazprombank is among numerous Russian financial institutions sanctioned by the United States.

South Africa’s Finance Minister Nhlanhla Nene told a judicial corruption inquiry on Wednesday that he was fired by former president Jacob Zuma in 2015 for refusing to approve a $100 billion nuclear power deal with Russia.

Nene is the highest-profile figure to give evidence at a probe into alleged influence-peddling by the Gupta family, friends of Zuma. The family is accused of using its relationship with the former leader to unduly win state contracts.

Zuma has repeatedly denied accusations by his opponents that he pushed for a deal with President Vladimir Putin at a BRICS summit for Russia to build a fleet of nuclear power stations in a corrupt deal with Russian state-owned Rosatom.

Opposition politicians and local investigative journalists say the proposed deal – which would have been the biggest state contract in South Africa’s history – would have included huge kickbacks for Zuma and the Gupta family.

The Indian-born brothers – Ajay, Atul and Rajesh – have been accused of using their ties with Zuma to siphon off billions of rand in state funds and inappropriately influencing cabinet appointments.

They left South Africa earlier this year when Zuma resigned under pressure from his party and the authorities are seeking their return to face prosecution.

In the first public account of the nuclear negotiations, Nene said Zuma became hostile toward him at a meeting at the summit when he refused to sign a guarantee letter Zuma wanted to present to Putin while in Russia.

“It was a very tense meeting that ended with us just being instructed by the president to go and find a solution, which we didn’t find,” Nene told the inquiry.

“I told the president in the meeting that I could not sign the letter without having first interrogated the financial and fiscal implications”

A spokesman for Zuma and the Kremlin did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Allegations of corruption have been swirling around Zuma and the Gupta brothers for years. Still, the current inquiry is for the first time allowing senior government officials to give their accounts to the public.

“Nene’s testimony is extraordinarily important. This is the person who was CEO when it comes to the public purse,” political analyst Ralph Mathekga said.

“Before this evidence it was difficult to connect the dots to Zuma. But this is a smoking gun which shows Zuma was a protagonist in this affair.”

Zuma fired Nene in December 2015 and replaced him with largely unknown lawmaker Des van Rooyen, sending markets into a tailspin before Zuma appointed investor-friendly Pravin Gordhan as his third finance minister in the space of four days.

Zuma’s successor as president Cyril Ramaphosa re-appointed Nene finance minister in February this year.

Nene told the inquiry he lost his job for not approving contracts that would benefit the Gupta family, particularly the Russian nuclear deal. His decision to reject a proposed national airline route to Sudan on grounds that it was not commercially viable also contributed to his sacking.

“I do believe I was removed as minister of finance for my refusal to toe the line in relation to certain projects,” he said.

Nene’s supporters have portrayed him as a principled official who sought to defend the country’s strained public finances against corrupt attacks from Zuma and his allies.

However, his detractors, including the radical opposition Economic Freedom Fighters, say he was involved in corrupt deals with the Guptas when he was deputy finance minister and head of the state pension fund from 2008-2014.

Nene told the inquiry he met the Gupta brothers several times, including four visits to their family home in Johannesburg between 2010-2013, but said it was normal practice to meet business leaders as a deputy finance minister.

© 2024, GDC. © GDC and www.globaldefensecorp.com. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to www.globaldefensecorp.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.