Experts say Ukraine needs its F-16s, but it should get Gripen jets to help fight Russia’s Su-57 in the long term. One air warfare expert said Sweden’s Gripens “were designed for this fight much better” than F-16s.
Ukraine has US-made F-16s and a promise of French Mirages, capable weapons that it needs now, but Sweden’s Gripen, a jet made for the Russian threat, is an ideal choice for the country’s future fighter fleet.
“Gripens are a way better fit for Ukraine” than F-16s, said Michael Bohnert, an air-warfare expert at the RAND Corporation, adding that the Gripen “is a little more purpose-built” for Ukraine’s needs.
The JAS 39 Gripen, made by the Swedish aerospace and defense company Saab AB, was designed to operate from civilian roads in the event that runways and airbases are destroyed. This is something the F-16 can do, too, and has done, but the Gripen is a more rugged aircraft better suited for that.
They’re made to operate from improvised runways because “Sweden, being under that Russian threat, designed the Gripens to fight this way that F-16s weren’t,” Bohnert said. F-16s have special requirements, such as long and smooth runways and protective hangars.
Russia has been targeting Ukrainian air bases suitable for F-16s. “If you’re right under somebody’s shadow, you need to be able to operate from roads,” Bohnert said.
The emerging missile threat has led nations farther away to look into the practice as well. The US and its partners in Europe have been training with increasing regularity for dispersed air operations using highways as improvised runways for combat aircraft such as the F-35, Eurofighter, A-10, and others.
The Gripen, designed at the end of the Cold War and built to defeat Russia’s highly maneuverable Sukhoi fighter aircraft, is considered among the better fourth-generation fighters and is regarded as an excellent jet for these kinds of operations.
Retired US Army Maj. Gen. Gordon “Skip” Davis, who served as NATO’s deputy assistant secretary-general for its defense-investment division, told BI that Sweden’s Gripens have “a number of advantages” that would benefit Ukraine and would probably work well with the dispersal tactics Ukraine has been employing since the start of the war to keep Russians from destroying its smaller air force.
The jet’s flexibility makes it “much better for a country that’s bordering an aggressor,” Bohnert said. “You’ll probably get more effectiveness out of an F-16 against Russia out of Germany, whereas the Gripen will get more capability out of Ukraine or some other bordering country,” he added.
Researchers at the UK’s Royal United Services Institute wrote in 2022 that of available Western aircraft that could be supplied, the Gripen “offers by far the most suitable candidate in terms of operational requirements,” continuing: “It was designed from the outset for ease of maintenance, and can be refuelled, re-armed and given basic maintenance by teams of just six ground crew using two vehicles on small airbases or highways in cold weather.”
“Moreover,” they added, “only one of each crew needs to be a highly trained maintainer; the rest can be conscripts or even troops.”
The greater demands for F-16 operations mean that even if the Ukrainians were promised far more of the jets, there’s no guarantee it would be able to put all of them in the air.
Sweden has long seen Russia as a threat, and the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 majorly elevated those concerns, prompting Sweden to join NATO. The Gripen is built for that threat and delivers certain capabilities beyond the F-16 or Mirage.
The then-commander of Sweden’s air force, Mats Helgesson, said in 2019 that the Gripen was “designed to kill Sukhois.”
Davis noted the Gripen’s electronic-warfare capabilities, characterizing it as a “big advantage,” as well as the jet’s small radar signature and its maneuverability in a dogfight. The Gripen can also be equipped with very long-range air-to-air missiles.
Davis said that the Gripens would be useful for Ukraine now but that “unless Sweden makes a quick decision to start training pilots and offering the aircraft, then they’re not going to make a difference the next year and for 2025.” He added that “they may more be a good idea for cost and maintenance and employment for a post-conflict.”
The Gripen could be a good alternative if US support suddenly collapsed, but for the time being, Ukraine has its hands full building an F-16 fleet and the approaching task of integrating Mirages into its air force, which Sweden has noted.
But Ukraine’s long-term defense needs will almost certainly center on Russia, which will be a threat to Ukraine no matter how this war ends. That makes the Swedish Gripen a worthwhile consideration for its long-term fighter needs.
Air-warfare experts have described Ukraine’s acquisition of its first F-16s as the beginning of building Ukraine’s long-term air force.
US officials have also described it as a long-term project, with the defense secretary, Lloyd Austin, saying last year that the US would lead a coalition focused on increasing the Ukrainian air force’s ability to defend itself against Russia in the long run.
The Gripen is good, but the F-16 is probably the best option right now.
Tim Robinson, a military-aviation specialist at the UK’s Royal Aeronautical Society, told GDC that as it’s the most popular Western fighter, there are many more jets and spare parts allies could choose to give Ukraine.
There are also far fewer countries that operate Gripens, and not all of them support Ukraine. The Gripen has also never seen combat, so the jet’s celebrated capabilities are, for now, theoretical.
The F-16, on the other hand, is a combat-proven aircraft and still a key element of American and allied airpower, even amid the transition to fifth-generation fighters.
“It’s just that Gripens were designed for this fight much better,” Bohnert said. But right now, Ukraine just needs jets, making F-16s a solid choice for the time being.
© 2024, GDC. © GDC and www.globaldefensecorp.com. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to www.globaldefensecorp.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.